Auramine Rhodamine O Stain: Rules Derived From Experience

Microscopy plays a major role in diagnosing and starting treatment for certain infection. Even though culture is the gold standard for diagnosis, it takes a considerable time to collect samples and process them. All of these have made it necessary to use a simple laboratory method that offers rapid diagnosis. There are undoubtedly numerous benefits to microscopy in terms of speed and practicality and it may become an even more useful tool if sensitivity could be increased.

An era of improved staining techniques that are quicker, more adaptable and dependable in result interpretation has resulted from the evolution of staining methodologies. Fluorescence microscopy is one of the recent breakthrough in smear microscopy. In mycobacteriology, the Auramine Rhodamine O stain is one of the special stains that has mostly supplanted the modified acid-fast stain since it is simple and takes less time to screen the smears. In contrast to acid fast stain, this staining gives very distinctive images and provides dependable results.

More research is required to standardise these stains, which are less costly, require no additional training or experience, are simple to use, provide quick results with higher sensitivity, and are readily available for clinical diagnosis.

The probability of missing the infections will undoubtedly decrease when such a stain is used in routine investigations. Here is a set of salient rules for effectively using this stain from a microbiologist's desk.

Auramine Rhodamine O

References

1. Hooja S, Pal N, Malhotra B, Goyal S, Kumar V, Vyas L. Comparison of Ziehl Neelsen & Auramine O staining methods on direct and concentrated smears in clinical specimens. Indian J Tuberc.2011;58(2):72-76.

2. Singh NP, Parija SC. The value of fluorescence microscopy of auramine stained sputum smears for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health.1998;29(4):860-863.

3. Gustavo Tapia-Sequeiros et al. Diagnostic performance of Ziehl-Neelsen staining and Auramine-Rhodamine staining techniques in the detection of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública. 2025;42(1), 37-45.

4. Kodigehalli Chikkanna Swamy, Ashwini and Anjan Kumar Patra. A Study on Comparison between Ziehl Neelsen Staining with Auramine Rhodamine Staining in Diagnosis of Paucibacillary Leprosy. International Journal of Science and Research 2021;10(4):177-181.

5. Kailash Chand Sharma et al. Ziehl Neelsen and Auramine Rhodamine staining: A comparative evaluation from North India. JMSCR Volume 08 Issue 06 June 2020;610-619.

6. Adiga DS, Hippargi SB, Rao G, Saha D, Yelikar BR, Karigoudar M. Evaluation of Fluorescent Staining for Diagnosis of Leprosy and its Impact on Grading of the Disease: Comparison with Conventional Staining. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(10):EC23-EC26.

7. Dharavath Savitha et al. Detection of Coccidian Parasites using Auramine Rhodamine Stain: A Rapid and Sensitive Tool. National Journal of Laboratory Medicine.2022;11(02):13-16.




Previous Post
No Comment
Add Comment
comment url