Smart Mycology: Key Practices for High Impact Results

Fungal infections have traditionally been diagnosed through direct microscopic examination of clinical samples, histopathology and culture. However, fungal diagnostics remain inherently challenging for numerous reasons. Many of these challenges are deeply rooted and will continue to limit progress in the field of mycology. Addressing them will require both technological innovation and the creative application of existing diagnostic methods. Most importantly, improvements in rapid diagnostic tests and accuracy are essential to significantly enhance patient outcomes.

Several impediments hinder effective diagnosis, including the declining number of trained clinical mycologists, high costs, prolonged time to obtain results and the need for high sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic tests. Additionally, fungal diagnostics must address contrasting global needs: the growing diversity of fungal pathogens associated with increased use of immunosuppressive therapies and the urgent need for accessible diagnostic tools in resource-limited settings, where opportunistic infections are highly prevalent.

As new technologies begin to bridge gaps in fungal detection, training programs in mycology particularly those focused on fungal identification are diminishing further. Given the vast diversity of pathogenic fungal species and the relatively limited range of organisms targeted by newer diagnostic technologies, there remains a critical need for skilled clinical mycologists proficient in morphological and phenotypic identification techniques.

Working in the field of mycology is undeniably challenging. Nevertheless, whether in small-scale laboratories or specialized referral centres, mycologists worldwide can achieve accurate and reliable results by adhering to essential laboratory practices and maintaining strong diagnostic expertise.

References

1. Mendonça A, Santos H, Franco-Duarte R, Sampaio P. Fungal infections diagnosis - Past, present and future. Res Microbiol. 2022;173(3):103915.

2. Kozel TR, Wickes B. Fungal diagnostics. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;4(4):a019299.

3. Gautam AK, Verma RK, Avasthi S, et al. Current Insight into Traditional and Modern Methods in Fungal Diversity Estimates. J Fungi (Basel). 2022;8(3):226.

4. Wickes BL, Romanelli AM. Diagnostic Mycology: Xtreme Challenges. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58(4):e01345-19.

5. https://clinicalgate.com/overview-of-fungal-identification-methods-and-strategies/

6. Wickes, B.L., Wiederhold, N.P. Molecular diagnostics in medical mycology. Nat Commun 2018;9:5135.

7. Knoll M, Steixner S, Lass-Flörl C.How to use direct microscopy for diagnosing fungal infections Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2023; 29, 1031-1038.

8. Reilly AA, Salkin IF, McGinnis MR, et al. Evaluation of mycology laboratory proficiency testing. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(7):2297-2305.